18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda MultiControl vs. Kumho Solus HA31 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Test Profile

Fulda
MultiControl
Kumho
Solus HA31
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
9
3
14
Best position
#2
#8
#8
Average position
23.8
8.3
13.4
Latest test
2025
2019
2026
Available sizes
64
82
153

Wet

Wet
Fulda MultiControl
75%
Kumho Solus HA31
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda MultiControl
87%
Kumho Solus HA31
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Wet braking
Fulda MultiControl
70%
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda MultiControl
77%
Kumho Solus HA31
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet handling
Fulda MultiControl
85%
Kumho Solus HA31
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%

Snow

Snow
Fulda MultiControl
86%
Kumho Solus HA31
67%

Dry

Dry
Fulda MultiControl
83%
Kumho Solus HA31
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry braking
Fulda MultiControl
75%
Kumho Solus HA31
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Dry handling
Fulda MultiControl
87%
Kumho Solus HA31
53%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Costs

Costs
Fulda MultiControl
85%
Kumho Solus HA31
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rolling resistance
Fulda MultiControl
85%
Kumho Solus HA31
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda MultiControl
70%
Kumho Solus HA31
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Fulda MultiControl
70%
Kumho Solus HA31
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison