18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda MultiControl vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Fulda
MultiControl
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
9
10
1
Best position
#2
#2
#1
Average position
23.8
6.0
1.0
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
64
104
64

Wet

Wet
Fulda MultiControl
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda MultiControl
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet braking
Fulda MultiControl
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda MultiControl
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Fulda MultiControl
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Snow

Snow
Fulda MultiControl
86%

Dry

Dry
Fulda MultiControl
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Fulda MultiControl
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Fulda MultiControl
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda MultiControl
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Fulda MultiControl
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Costs

Costs
Fulda MultiControl
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Fulda MultiControl
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison