18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda MultiControl vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Test Profile

Fulda
MultiControl
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
9
10
14
Best position
#2
#2
#8
Average position
23.8
6.0
13.4
Latest test
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
64
104
153

Wet

Wet
Fulda MultiControl
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda MultiControl
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Wet braking
Fulda MultiControl
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda MultiControl
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet handling
Fulda MultiControl
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%

Snow

Snow
Fulda MultiControl
86%

Dry

Dry
Fulda MultiControl
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry handling
Fulda MultiControl
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Dry braking
Fulda MultiControl
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda MultiControl
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Fulda MultiControl
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Costs

Costs
Fulda MultiControl
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rolling resistance
Fulda MultiControl
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison