18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda MultiControl vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Fulda
MultiControl
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
9
14
10
Best position
#2
#8
#2
Average position
23.8
13.4
6.0
Latest test
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
64
153
104

Wet

Wet
Fulda MultiControl
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda MultiControl
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Wet braking
Fulda MultiControl
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda MultiControl
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet handling
Fulda MultiControl
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Snow

Snow
Fulda MultiControl
86%

Dry

Dry
Fulda MultiControl
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Fulda MultiControl
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry handling
Fulda MultiControl
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda MultiControl
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Fulda MultiControl
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Costs

Costs
Fulda MultiControl
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rolling resistance
Fulda MultiControl
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison