18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2


Comparing Fulda EcoControl HP2 and Kumho Ecsta HS52 summer tyres from Fulda and Kumho respectively provides insight into the performance of these esteemed high profile products. Both tyres have proven themselves through numerous tests, with each showcasing its unique strengths and weaknesses.


Starting with the Fulda EcoControl HP2, the successor of the EcoControl HP, it earned an overall rating of 69% in our test. Key strengths highlighted in Autobild's tests were 'Exterior noise,' with two mentions. In terms of its positioning in the test, it came in 16th out of 55 tyres. Additionally, autobild 2024 noted the EcoControl HP2's pros as being good in terms of environmental balance, lifespan, abrasion, and efficiency. Nevertheless, it underperformed in wet conditions and lacks overall balance.


On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta HS52, replacing the Ecsta HS51, earned a higher rating of 73% in our tests. This touring type tyre surpassed its counterpart in Autobild's test, claiming the second spot out of 55 tyres. Its notable strengths, as per Autobild were 'Dry braking,' 'Dry handling,' and 'Wet braking' with each being mentioned twice. Furthermore, autobild 2024 highlights the Ecsta HS52’s performance on dry and wet surfaces but criticizes its relative weakness in terms of environmental balance, efficiency, and sustainability.


The ADAC comparative test positions the Kumho Ecsta HS52 as 8th out of 50 tyres, while the Fulda EcoControl HP2 stands at the 13th spot. Evidently, the Kumho's performance is more balanced, offering good control on both dry and wet roads. However, its environmental balance and efficiency need improvement. Conversely, the Fulda tyre gets high marks for its environmental balance, lifespan, and efficiency but needs to address performance on wet surfaces.


In conclusion, although both tyres have their merits, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 seems to be the better of the two in most areas of performance. Its dry and wet braking is exceptional according to multiple tests. However, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 is certainly not to be overlooked, especially for those prioritizing environmental efficacy and lifespan.

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
8
10
18
3
3
Best position
#4
#2
#1
#2
#2
Average position
12.8
6.0
6.1
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2024
2026
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
30
104
47
34
40

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP2
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet braking
Fulda EcoControl HP2
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet side guide
Fulda EcoControl HP2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison