Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Budget

Fulda

EcoControl HP2

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

EcoControl HP2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

UltraGrip Performance+

Number of tests

8

3

14

23

Best position

#4

#2

#1

Average position

12.8

3.3

3.6

3.3

Latest test

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

30

40

188

176

Wet

Fulda EcoControl HP2

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Fulda EcoControl HP2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Wet braking

Fulda EcoControl HP2

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Aquaplaning - cross

Fulda EcoControl HP2

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Wet handling

Fulda EcoControl HP2

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Wet circle cornering

Fulda EcoControl HP2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Wet performance

Fulda EcoControl HP2

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Dry

Fulda EcoControl HP2

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Dry braking

Fulda EcoControl HP2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Dry handling

Fulda EcoControl HP2

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Dry performance

Fulda EcoControl HP2

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

72%

Dry driving behavior

Fulda EcoControl HP2

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

76%

Comfort

Fulda EcoControl HP2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Exterior noise

Fulda EcoControl HP2

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Comfort

Fulda EcoControl HP2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Interior noise

Fulda EcoControl HP2

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Costs

Fulda EcoControl HP2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Mileage

Fulda EcoControl HP2

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Rolling resistance

Fulda EcoControl HP2

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Price/value

Fulda EcoControl HP2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

EcoControl HP2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

UltraGrip Performance+

UltraGrip Performance+

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison