Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Budget

Fulda

EcoControl HP2

VS

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

EcoControl HP2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

Number of tests

8

3

14

5

1

Best position

#4

#2

#1

Average position

12.8

3.3

3.6

2.2

1.0

Latest test

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

30

40

188

63

64

Wet

Fulda EcoControl HP2

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Fulda EcoControl HP2

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Fulda EcoControl HP2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Fulda EcoControl HP2

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet handling

Fulda EcoControl HP2

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet circle cornering

Fulda EcoControl HP2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet performance

Fulda EcoControl HP2

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Dry

Fulda EcoControl HP2

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Fulda EcoControl HP2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Fulda EcoControl HP2

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry performance

Fulda EcoControl HP2

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Comfort

Fulda EcoControl HP2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Fulda EcoControl HP2

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Fulda EcoControl HP2

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Interior noise

Fulda EcoControl HP2

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Costs

Fulda EcoControl HP2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Mileage

Fulda EcoControl HP2

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Rolling resistance

Fulda EcoControl HP2

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Price/value

Fulda EcoControl HP2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

EcoControl HP2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison