18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Fulda (68%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo has a better rating of 83% compared to 72% of the Fulda EcoControl HP2. The first tyre test of Fulda EcoControl HP2 was done in 2021, compared to 2026 when was the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Fulda EcoControl HP2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo has A rating.

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport Evo
Number of tests
8
2
Best position
#4
#3
Average position
12.8
7.0
Latest test
2024
2026
Available sizes
30
92

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP2
65%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP2
83%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
45%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
67%
Wet braking
Fulda EcoControl HP2
63%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
97%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
76%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP2
74%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
90%
Dry braking
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
97%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
38%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
38%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
61%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP2
82%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP2
72%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
61%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison