18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Nokian WetProof vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Fulda EcoControl HPBudget
FuldaFulda

EcoControl HP

R14 – R17
Nokian WetProofUpper-middle
NokianNokian

WetProof

5.9
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Nokian
WetProof
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
6
14
3
Best position
#6
#1
#2
Average position
9.8
5.6
3.3
Latest test
2018
2023
2026
Available sizes
70
47
40

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Nokian WetProof
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Nokian WetProof
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Nokian WetProof
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Nokian WetProof
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Nokian WetProof
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Nokian WetProof
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Nokian WetProof
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Nokian WetProof
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Nokian WetProof
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Nokian WetProof
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Nokian WetProof
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Nokian WetProof
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison