18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Nokian WetProof vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Nokian
WetProof
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
6
14
14
Best position
#6
#1
#8
Average position
9.8
5.6
13.4
Latest test
2018
2023
2026
Available sizes
70
47
153

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Nokian WetProof
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Nokian WetProof
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Nokian WetProof
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Nokian WetProof
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Nokian WetProof
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Nokian WetProof
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Nokian WetProof
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Price/value
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Nokian WetProof
46%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Nokian WetProof
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Nokian WetProof
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Nokian WetProof
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Nokian WetProof
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Nokian WetProof
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison