18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Nokian WetProof vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Fulda EcoControl HP

Fulda

EcoControl HP

VS

Nokian WetProof

Nokian

WetProof

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Fulda

EcoControl HP

Nokian

WetProof

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Number of tests

6

14

14

Best position

#6

#1

#8

Average position

9.8

5.6

13.4

Latest test

2018

2023

2026

Available sizes

70

47

153

Wet

Wet

Fulda EcoControl HP

90%

Nokian WetProof

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Wet handling

Fulda EcoControl HP

91%

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Aquaplaning - cross

Fulda EcoControl HP

81%

Nokian WetProof

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Fulda EcoControl HP

92%

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Wet circle cornering

Fulda EcoControl HP

92%

Nokian WetProof

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Costs

Costs

Fulda EcoControl HP

72%

Nokian WetProof

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Mileage

Fulda EcoControl HP

100%

Nokian WetProof

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Price/value

Fulda EcoControl HP

100%

Nokian WetProof

46%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Rolling resistance

Fulda EcoControl HP

51%

Nokian WetProof

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Comfort

Comfort

Fulda EcoControl HP

82%

Nokian WetProof

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Exterior noise

Fulda EcoControl HP

82%

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Dry

Dry

Fulda EcoControl HP

96%

Nokian WetProof

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Dry handling

Fulda EcoControl HP

96%

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison