18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
6
15
3
Best position
#6
#2
#2
Average position
9.8
9.0
3.3
Latest test
2018
2025
2026
Available sizes
70
225
60

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Price/value
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison