18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Fulda EcoControl HPBudget
FuldaFulda

EcoControl HP

R14 – R17
Kumho Ecsta PS71Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta PS71

8.3
R16 – R22
Firestone Roadhawk 2Upper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
6
15
6
Best position
#6
#2
#3
Average position
9.8
9.0
4.7
Latest test
2018
2025
2026
Available sizes
70
225
146

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Price/value
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison