18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Fulda EcoControl HP

Fulda

EcoControl HP

VS

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Kumho (59%). The first tyre test of Fulda EcoControl HP was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Fulda EcoControl HP has B wet grip rating, whereas 76% of Kumho Ecsta PS71 has A rating.

Test Profile

Fulda

EcoControl HP

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

6

15

Best position

#6

#2

Average position

9.8

9.0

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

70

225

Wet

Wet

Fulda EcoControl HP

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Fulda EcoControl HP

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Fulda EcoControl HP

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Wet circle cornering

Fulda EcoControl HP

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Wet handling

Fulda EcoControl HP

91%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Costs

Costs

Fulda EcoControl HP

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Price/value

Fulda EcoControl HP

100%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Rolling resistance

Fulda EcoControl HP

51%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Mileage

Fulda EcoControl HP

100%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Comfort

Comfort

Fulda EcoControl HP

82%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

Fulda EcoControl HP

82%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Dry

Dry

Fulda EcoControl HP

96%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry handling

Fulda EcoControl HP

96%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison