18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+

Fulda EcoControl HPBudget
FuldaFulda

EcoControl HP

R14 – R17
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Michelin Primacy 4+Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4+

7.6
R16 – R21
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3) Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Number of tests
6
10
13
Best position
#6
#2
#1
Average position
9.8
6.0
4.3
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
Available sizes
70
104
123

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison