18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Number of tests
6
10
3
3
Best position
#6
#2
#2
#1
Average position
9.8
6.0
3.3
4.7
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
70
104
40
126

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison