18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Fulda EcoControl HPBudget
FuldaFulda

EcoControl HP

R14 – R17
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Firestone Roadhawk 2Upper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3) Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
6
10
6
Best position
#6
#2
#3
Average position
9.8
6.0
4.7
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
Available sizes
70
104
146

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison