18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Fulda EcoControl HP

Fulda

EcoControl HP

VS

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Fulda

EcoControl HP

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

6

10

3

Best position

#6

#2

#2

Average position

9.8

6.0

3.7

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

Available sizes

70

104

34

Wet

Wet

Fulda EcoControl HP

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Fulda EcoControl HP

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Fulda EcoControl HP

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Fulda EcoControl HP

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Fulda EcoControl HP

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Costs

Costs

Fulda EcoControl HP

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Fulda EcoControl HP

51%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Fulda EcoControl HP

100%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dry

Dry

Fulda EcoControl HP

96%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Fulda EcoControl HP

96%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Comfort

Fulda EcoControl HP

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Fulda EcoControl HP

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison