18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Fulda EcoControl HP

Fulda

EcoControl HP

VS

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Fulda

EcoControl HP

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Number of tests

6

10

14

Best position

#6

#2

#8

Average position

9.8

6.0

13.4

Latest test

2018

2026

2026

Available sizes

70

104

153

Wet

Wet

Fulda EcoControl HP

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Aquaplaning - cross

Fulda EcoControl HP

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Fulda EcoControl HP

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Wet circle cornering

Fulda EcoControl HP

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Wet handling

Fulda EcoControl HP

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Costs

Costs

Fulda EcoControl HP

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Price/value

Fulda EcoControl HP

100%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Rolling resistance

Fulda EcoControl HP

51%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Mileage

Fulda EcoControl HP

100%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Dry

Dry

Fulda EcoControl HP

96%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Dry handling

Fulda EcoControl HP

96%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Comfort

Comfort

Fulda EcoControl HP

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Exterior noise

Fulda EcoControl HP

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison