18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
11
3
Best position
#6
#1
#2
Average position
9.8
11.6
3.7
Latest test
2018
2024
2025
Available sizes
70
121
34

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Price/value
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison