18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Fulda EcoControl HP

Fulda

EcoControl HP

VS

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Fulda

EcoControl HP

Hankook

ION Evo

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

6

1

10

Best position

#6

#1

#2

Average position

9.8

1.0

6.0

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

Available sizes

70

64

104

Wet

Wet

Fulda EcoControl HP

90%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Fulda EcoControl HP

81%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Fulda EcoControl HP

92%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Wet circle cornering

Fulda EcoControl HP

92%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Wet handling

Fulda EcoControl HP

91%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Costs

Costs

Fulda EcoControl HP

72%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Rolling resistance

Fulda EcoControl HP

51%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Mileage

Fulda EcoControl HP

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Comfort

Comfort

Fulda EcoControl HP

82%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Exterior noise

Fulda EcoControl HP

82%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Dry

Dry

Fulda EcoControl HP

96%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Dry handling

Fulda EcoControl HP

96%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison