18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Fulda EcoControl HP

Fulda

EcoControl HP

VS

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Fulda

EcoControl HP

Hankook

ION Evo

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

6

1

3

Best position

#6

#1

#2

Average position

9.8

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2018

2025

2025

Available sizes

70

64

34

Wet

Wet

Fulda EcoControl HP

90%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet handling

Fulda EcoControl HP

91%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Fulda EcoControl HP

81%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Fulda EcoControl HP

92%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Costs

Costs

Fulda EcoControl HP

72%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Fulda EcoControl HP

51%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dry

Dry

Fulda EcoControl HP

96%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Fulda EcoControl HP

96%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Comfort

Fulda EcoControl HP

82%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Fulda EcoControl HP

82%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison