18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
3
10
3
Best position
#6
#2
#2
#2
Average position
9.8
3.3
6.0
3.7
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
70
40
104
34

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison