18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Number of tests
6
3
11
Best position
#6
#2
#1
Average position
9.8
3.3
11.6
Latest test
2018
2026
2024
Available sizes
70
40
121

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison