18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
6
3
1
Best position
#6
#2
#1
Average position
9.8
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
Available sizes
70
40
64

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison