18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
6
18
2
Best position
#6
#1
#1
Average position
9.8
6.1
1.0
Latest test
2018
2024
2025
Available sizes
70
47
23

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison