18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Fulda EcoControl HPBudget
FuldaFulda

EcoControl HP

R14 – R17
Firestone Roadhawk 2Upper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Also compare with
Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5 Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
6
6
26
Best position
#6
#3
#1
Average position
9.8
4.7
2.2
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
Available sizes
70
146
66

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Price/value
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison