18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
6
3
5
1
Best position
#6
#2
#1
#1
Average position
9.8
3.7
2.2
1.0
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
70
34
63
64

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison