Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Budget

Fulda

EcoControl HP

R14 – R17

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

9.5

R16 – R20

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

EcoControl HP

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

6

3

2

Best position

#6

#2

#1

Average position

9.8

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

70

34

23

Wet

Fulda EcoControl HP

90%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Wet handling

Fulda EcoControl HP

91%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - cross

Fulda EcoControl HP

81%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Fulda EcoControl HP

92%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Costs

Fulda EcoControl HP

72%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

Fulda EcoControl HP

51%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Dry

Fulda EcoControl HP

96%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry handling

Fulda EcoControl HP

96%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Comfort

Fulda EcoControl HP

82%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Fulda EcoControl HP

82%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

EcoControl HP

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison