18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Fulda EcoControl HPBudget
FuldaFulda

EcoControl HP

R14 – R17
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
6
3
26
Best position
#6
#2
#1
Average position
9.8
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2018
2025
2026
Available sizes
70
34
66

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Price/value
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison