18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Nokian WetProof

Fulda EcoControl HPBudget
FuldaFulda

EcoControl HP

R14 – R17
Continental PremiumContact 6Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 6

7.6
R15 – R22
Nokian WetProofUpper-middle
NokianNokian

WetProof

5.9
R14 – R20
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Nokian
WetProof
Number of tests
6
36
14
Best position
#6
#1
#1
Average position
9.8
3.1
5.6
Latest test
2018
2023
2023
Available sizes
70
296
47

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Nokian WetProof
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Nokian WetProof
91%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Nokian WetProof
72%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Nokian WetProof
60%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Nokian WetProof
61%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Nokian WetProof
56%
Price/value
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Nokian WetProof
46%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Nokian WetProof
80%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Nokian WetProof
79%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Nokian WetProof
86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison