18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Fulda EcoControl HPBudget
FuldaFulda

EcoControl HP

R14 – R17
Continental PremiumContact 6Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 6

7.6
R15 – R22
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
6
36
10
Best position
#6
#1
#2
Average position
9.8
3.1
6.0
Latest test
2018
2023
2026
Available sizes
70
296
104

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Price/value
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison