18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Germany. Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Fulda (68%). The first tyre test of Fulda EcoControl HP was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Fulda EcoControl HP has B wet grip rating, whereas 83% of Continental PremiumContact 6 has A rating.

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Number of tests
6
36
Best position
#6
#1
Average position
9.8
3.1
Latest test
2018
2023
Available sizes
70
296

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Price/value
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison