18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Nokian WetProof

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nokian
WetProof
Number of tests
6
14
14
Best position
#6
#8
#1
Average position
9.8
13.4
5.6
Latest test
2018
2026
2023
Available sizes
70
153
47

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nokian WetProof
84%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Nokian WetProof
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Nokian WetProof
91%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Nokian WetProof
60%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Nokian WetProof
56%
Price/value
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Nokian WetProof
46%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Nokian WetProof
61%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Nokian WetProof
79%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Nokian WetProof
86%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Nokian WetProof
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison