18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Fulda EcoControl HP

Fulda

EcoControl HP

VS

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Fulda

EcoControl HP

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

6

14

15

Best position

#6

#8

#2

Average position

9.8

13.4

9.0

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

Available sizes

70

153

225

Wet

Wet

Fulda EcoControl HP

90%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Fulda EcoControl HP

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Fulda EcoControl HP

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Wet circle cornering

Fulda EcoControl HP

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Wet handling

Fulda EcoControl HP

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Costs

Costs

Fulda EcoControl HP

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Price/value

Fulda EcoControl HP

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Rolling resistance

Fulda EcoControl HP

51%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Mileage

Fulda EcoControl HP

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Comfort

Comfort

Fulda EcoControl HP

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

Fulda EcoControl HP

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Dry

Dry

Fulda EcoControl HP

96%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry handling

Fulda EcoControl HP

96%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison