18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Number of tests
6
14
11
Best position
#6
#8
#1
Average position
9.8
13.4
11.6
Latest test
2018
2026
2024
Available sizes
70
153
121

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Price/value
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison