18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
6
14
3
Best position
#6
#8
#2
Average position
9.8
13.4
3.3
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
Available sizes
70
153
60

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Price/value
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison