18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
14
3
Best position
#6
#8
#2
Average position
9.8
13.4
3.7
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
Available sizes
70
153
34

Wet

Wet
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Costs

Costs
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dry

Dry
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison