Segment
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 SUV Upper-middle2. Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Fortuna) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber allround tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Fortuna (0%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/50 R18 test, where both the Eco Plus 2 4S and the Quadraxer 3 SUV were tested.
| # | Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | |||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 SUV Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 4.2 | 1– | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | ||
| Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S Rating: Not recommended | 4.2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 3.1 | 2+ | 3+ | 2 | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
