Segment
2. Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Fortuna) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear allround tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Fortuna (0%). The first tyre test of Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S was done in 2025, compared to 2020 when was the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/50 R18 test, where both the Eco Plus 2 4S and the Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 were tested.
| # | Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Test winner
Worst rating in test
1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 4.2 | 1– | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | ||
| Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S Rating: Not recommended | 4.2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Rating: Good | 1.9 | 1– | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
