Segment
2. Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Fortuna) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear allround tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Fortuna (0%). The first tyre test of Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S was done in 2025, compared to 2020 when was the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/50 R18 test, where both the Eco Plus 2 4S and the Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 were tested.
| # | Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S Lowcost
1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Test winner
1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 4.2 | 1– | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | ||
| Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S Rating: Not recommended | 4.2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Rating: Good | 1.9 | 1– | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||