Segment
2. Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S vs. Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Fortuna) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone allround tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Fortuna (0%). The first tyre test of Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S was done in 2025, compared to 2023 when was the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/50 R18 test, where both the Eco Plus 2 4S and the Turanza All Season 6 were tested.
| # | Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S
| Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 4.2 | 1– | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | ||
| Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S Rating: Not recommended | 4.2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Rating: Exemplary | 1.2 | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
