Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Roadhawk

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

21

4

3

Best position

#2

#3

#2

Average position

11.9

12.0

3.3

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2024

2025

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

164

111

40

34

60

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet braking

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Wet handling

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Wet side guide

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry braking

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dry handling

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Dry steering response

Firestone Roadhawk

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Mileage

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Price/value

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Roadhawk

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison