18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Falken e.Ziex

Firestone RoadhawkUpper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

8.7
R17 – R21
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
21
3
3
Best position
#2
#1
#2
Average position
11.9
4.0
3.7
Latest test
2024
2026
2025
Available sizes
164
54
34

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
52%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
52%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison