18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
21
1
18
3
2
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
11.9
1.0
6.1
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2024
2025
2024
2026
2025
Available sizes
164
64
47
40
23

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Wet side guide
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison