Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Dynaxer HP4

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

21

3

11

1

5

Best position

#2

#1

Average position

11.9

3.3

11.6

1.0

2.2

Latest test

2024

2026

2024

2025

Available sizes

164

40

121

64

63

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Wet braking

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet handling

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry braking

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dry handling

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dry driving behavior

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

74%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

87%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Interior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Mileage

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Rolling resistance

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Price/value

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Dynaxer HP4

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison