Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Ecsta PS71

e.Ziex

Number of tests

21

3

1

15

3

Best position

#2

#1

#2

Average position

11.9

3.3

1.0

9.0

3.7

Latest test

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

164

40

64

225

34

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry driving behavior

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Interior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

66%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Price/value

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Fuel efficiency

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Ecsta PS71

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison