Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

21

3

5

3

Best position

#2

#1

#2

Average position

11.9

3.3

2.2

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2024

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

164

40

63

34

60

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet braking

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Wet handling

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry braking

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dry handling

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Interior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Mileage

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Price/value

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison