18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
21
3
18
6
3
1
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#3
#2
#1
Average position
11.9
3.3
6.1
4.7
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2024
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
164
40
47
146
34
64

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet side guide
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison