Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Roadhawk 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

21

3

2

6

3

Best position

#2

#1

#3

#2

Average position

11.9

3.3

1.0

4.7

3.7

Latest test

2024

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

164

40

23

146

34

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet side guide

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

60%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Roadhawk 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison