18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
21
3
26
3
1
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
11.9
3.3
2.2
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
164
40
66
34
64

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet side guide
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry steering response
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison