Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Number of tests

21

5

3

1

26

Best position

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

11.9

2.2

3.3

1.0

2.2

Latest test

2024

2025

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

164

63

40

64

66

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Wet handling

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Wet braking

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry braking

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry handling

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Exterior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Interior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

88%

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Rolling resistance

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Mileage

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Price/value

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison